The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have caused a bipartisan clamor for a civilian corps of U.S. nation builders--a good idea only if implemented properly.
Reforming U.S. development and foreign assistance institutions is essential to stave off the militarization of foreign policy and to remake overall U.S. security strategy.
Despite pressure from the Pentagon, either Barack Obama or John McCain must restrain military spending in order to return coherence and discipline to the defense planning process.
It's incumbent upon either Barack Obama or John McCain to revamp how the White House offices formulate U.S. national security policy. Here's how they should do it.
Five significant challenges to national security will greet the new U.S. president in January--and each demands equal attention and a fresh approach.
A new cabinet department dedicated exclusively to development will not cure what ails Washington’s foreign aid programs.
The Pentagon continues to ask for endless defense funding with little regard for the damage inflated budgets will do down the road.
The Bush administration finally recognizes that the United States cannot keep creating new assistance programs around the globe while cutting the staff we need to run them.
Some defense analysts think Washington needs to continue spending money on the military at record levels. But it's an assertion unsupported by any strategy or need.
Four recent reports outline ways in which Washington can fix the dysfunctional, underfunded civilian agencies that define and implement U.S. foreign policy and assistance activities.
A historically large defense budget reflects more of the same: U.S. reliance on the military to solve all of Washington's security woes.
For Washington to successfully address the security challenges it faces, the mission and culture at U.S. foreign-policy agencies such as the State Department must be revamped.
Too often Washington confronts its national security challenges by installing a "czar" to knock heads and inspire collaboration among government agencies. Here’s why that approach doesn’t work.
By asking what if, U.S. policy makers and advisers might find the solutions to restoring the country's credibility abroad.
If the United States wants to engage the world with something other than force, it needs to fix the chaotic way it provides foreign assistance.
Many in the United States think that adding more troops will solve all of the country's current and future national security problems. They should think again.
Letting the Pentagon execute a growing portion of the U.S. national security policy isn't in the best interest of the military or the country.
If at first the U.S. Armed Services don’t receive the funding they want, they try, try again.